IVP - Behind the Books - Christianity Archives

September 14, 2012

The Significant Work of the Christian Bookstore

The following article is an adaptation of a piece from CBA Retailers + Resources by Jeff Crosby, associate publisher and director of sales and marketing for InterVarsity Press.

The theologian Klaus Bockmuehl once wrote that books are “God’s instruments in the history of salvation.” As a long-time bookseller in Bloomington, Indiana before joining IVP in 1998, I clung to Bockmuehl’s thesis as I went about my front-line work putting books in the hands of readers. I believed wholeheartedly that he was right on target—that there is something of significant, transcendent value in ideas expressed carefully, artfully in books.

I still do.

In my travels representing InterVarsity Press, I continue to find bookstores doing their work in light of that belief, and serving readers like you and publishers like IVP exceptionally well. Bookstores like Hearts and Minds in Dallastown, Pennsylvania; Logos Bookstore in Dallas; and Eighth Day Books in Wichita, Kansas. They are shining examples of stores distinguishing themselves through the stocking and promoting of thoughtful books.

When Logos Bookstore opened in 1974, there were 25 Christian retail stores in Dallas. Today there are comparatively few, but the store in Snider Plaza on the near north side of the city still stands, still serves readers.

logos.png

“Our establishing of a niche with a broader selection of books (than simply bestsellers) has helped us weather the storm,” said Rick Lewis, who with his wife, Susan, owns and manages the store. “We do carry many of the best-selling titles—they help us generate the capital that enables us to carry the titles that I believe have a deeper impact, a more long-lasting impact.”

The familiar injunction from Matthew 6:33 (“But seek first his kingdom and his righteousness, and all these things will be given to you as well”) guides the work going on at Hearts and Minds Bookstore, owned and managed by Byron and Beth Borger.

Byron Borger.jpgThe Borgers see their store's mission embodying at least four key characteristics: >Serving the diversity of the church as a theological principle even more than as a business strategy; equipping students of local colleges in the integration of faith and learning; helping people integrate faith and vocation; and guiding men and women in toward experiencing more of God through reading on the contemplative life.

“We carry the sorts of books that we think will be useful for the vision we have of equipping the saints to live faithfully in every area of life,” Byron said. “We keep books on hand that aren’t as popular, but can help folks think through these significant areas of whole-life discipleship.”

Eighth Day Books, owned and managed by Warren Farha, has specialized in classic books across the disciplines of art, science, and the humanities since 1988, when the original store was opened in Wichita.

Eighth Day Books.jpg

“From the beginning, we have not been a typical independent bookstore; we eschew the trendy, and do not carry books solely based on their salability,” Farha says of the store. “Instead, we’re selective, offering an eccentric community of books based on this organizing principle: if a book—be it literary, scientific, historical, or theological—sheds light on ultimate questions in an excellent way, then it’s a worthy candidate for inclusion in our catalog” or store.

These and many other stores across the country are doing significant work serving the breadth of the church and their communities with thoughtful Christian literature that can be an essential part of the awakening and deepening and enlarging of the faith of men and women they come in contact with.

Do you have a store like this in your area? If so, are you supporting it? As a publisher of thoughtful Christian books, we encourage you to do so wherever possible.

“The best disciplers I’ve had through the years have been authors,” Lewis said. “Having read these books enables me to sell them. I can say that George MacDonald deepened my love for God. Reading Henri Nouwen helped me grow in compassion. C.S. Lewis and John Stott sharpened my thinking. Richard Foster encouraged me in the disciplines. The storytelling of Walter Wangerin, Stephen Lawhead and Madeleine L’Engle improved my imagination and aided my wonder. Brennan Manning told me God loves me, as I am. I cannot not tell others about them.”

If you have a bookseller like this in your area, we encourage you to support them and their work. We’ll all be better off when you do.

Posted by Leah Kiple at 3:53 PM

April 2, 2010

A Good Friday

What happened on the cross is the magnificent mystery of the Christian faith. The implications for us and for the entire cosmos are more than we will ever entirely apprehend in this life. We at once mourn the necessity of the cross and celebrate in it God’s victory over sin, death, hell and Satan.

While there is mystery, deep mystery, this doesn’t mean we can’t know anything truly about the cross. There is much we can know with certainty. And there are misunderstandings we should avoid.

The classic book on the topic is no doubt John Stott’s The Cross of Christ. It has been out for over twenty years now and continues to prove to be an invaluable meditation on the central event of the Christian faith. Here are some selections (presented here without ellipses) from Stott’s pivotal chapter, “The Self-Substitution of God.”

How then could God express simultaneously his holiness in judgment and his love in pardon? Only by providing a divine substitute for the sinner so that the substitute would receive the judgment and the sinner the pardon. We sinners still of course have to suffer some of the personal, psychological and social consequences of our sins, but the penal consequence, the deserved penalty of alienation from God, has been borne by Another in our place, so that we may be spared it.

The key question we now have to address is this: exactly who was our substitute? Who took our place, bore our sin, became our curse, endured our penalty, died our death? To be sure, “while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Rom 5:8). That would be the simple, surface answer. But who was this Christ? How are we to think of him?

The first proposal is that the substitute was the man Christ Jesus, viewed as a human being and conceived as an individual separate from both God and us, an independent third party. Those who begin with this a priori lay themselves open to gravely distorted understandings of the atonement and so bring the truth of substitution into disrepute. They tend to present the cross in one or other of two ways, according to whether the initiative was Christ’s or God’s. In the one case Christ is pictured as intervening in order to pacify an angry God and wrest from him a grudging salvation. In the other, the intervention is ascribed to God, who proceeds to punish the innocent Jesus in place of us the guilty sinners who had deserved the punishment. In both cases God and Christ are sundered from one another: either Christ persuades God or God punishes Christ. What is characteristic of both presentations is that they denigrate the Father. Reluctant to suffer himself, he victimizes Christ instead. Reluctant to forgive, he is prevailed on by Christ to do so. He is seen as a pitiless ogre whose wrath has to be assuaged, whose disinclination to act has to be overcome, by the loving self-sacrifice of Jesus.

It is true that the sins of Israel were transferred to the scapegoat, that “the LORD laid on him,” his suffering servant, all our iniquity (Is 53:6), that “it was the LORD’s will to crush him” (Is 53:10), and that Jesus applied to himself Zechariah’s prophecy that God would “strike the shepherd” (Zech 13:7; Mk 14:27). It is also true that in the New Testament God is said to have “sent” his Son to atone for our sins (1 Jn 4:9-10), “delivered him up” for us (Acts 2:23; Rom 8:32), “presented him as a sacrifice of atonement” (Rom 3:25), “condemned sin” in his flesh (Rom 8:3), and “made him … to be sin for us” (2 Cor 5:21). These are striking statements. But we have no liberty to interpret them in such a way as to imply either that God compelled Jesus to do what he was unwilling to do himself, or that Jesus was an unwilling victim of God’s harsh justice. Jesus Christ did indeed bear the penalty of our sins, but God was active in and through Christ doing it, and Christ was freely playing his part (e.g., Heb 10:5-10).

We must not, then, speak of God punishing Jesus or of Jesus persuading God, for to do so is to set them over against each other as if they acted independently of each other or were even in conflict with each other. We must never make Christ the object of God’s punishment or God the object of Christ’s persuasion, for both God and Christ were subjects not objects, taking the initiative together to save sinners. Whatever happened on the cross in terms of “God-forsakenness” was voluntarily accepted by both in the same holy love that made atonement necessary. It was “God in our nature forsaken of God.”

The Father did not lay on the Son an ordeal he was reluctant to bear, nor did the Son extract from the Father a salvation he was reluctant to bestow. There is no suspicion anywhere in the New Testament of discord between the Father and the Son, “whether by the Son wresting forgiveness from an unwilling Father or by the Father demanding a sacrifice from an unwilling Son.” There was no unwillingness in either. On the contrary, their wills coincided in the perfect self-sacrifice of love.

Our substitute, then, who took our place and died our death on the cross, was neither Christ alone (since that would make him a third party thrust in between God and us), nor God alone (since that would undermine the historical incarnation), but God in Christ, who was truly and fully both God and man and who on that account was uniquely qualified to represent both God and man and to mediate between them. If we speak only of Christ suffering and dying, we overlook the initiative of the Father. If we speak only of God suffering and dying, we overlook the mediation of the Son. The New Testament authors never attribute the atonement either to Christ in such a way as to disassociate him from the Father, or to God in such a way as to dispense with Christ, but rather to God and Christ, or to God acting in and through Christ with his whole-hearted concurrence.

This is the mystery on which we meditate and which we celebrate.

Posted by Andy Le Peau at 6:18 AM

Get Email Updates

You'll get an email whenever a new entry is posted to Behind the Books

Subscribe to Feeds

Got a Book Idea?

Please follow our submissions guidelines. We cannot respond to book proposals or inquiries within the context of this blog.